echo "test"; ?> |
|
|
|
| Tiffen 58mm 47 Filter (Blue) | 
enlarge | Brand: Tiffen Category: Photography
List Price: $44.99 Buy New: $25.50 You Save: $19.49 (43%)
New (3) Used (1) from $20.50
Avg. Customer Rating: 130 reviews
Media: Electronics Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2 Dimensions (in): 4.2 x 3.4 x 0.9 Warranty: 10 years warranty
MPN: 5847 Model: 5847 UPC: 049383034363 EAN: 0049383034363 ASIN: B00004ZCCU
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
|
| Features:
| | Dark blue filter | | | Accentuates haze and fog | | | Used for dye transfer and contrast effect | | | 58mm diameter |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description The Blue 47 is a dark blue filter that accentuates haze and fog. It can be used for dye transfer and contrast effects. Although originally intended for use with black and white film, this filter can also be used as a creative tool in color photography.
Amazon.com Product Description Primarily for black-and-white photography.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 125 more reviews...
Good filter for digital October 13, 2008 This filter is used to balance the brighter areas of your picture to the darker ones, e.g. lighter sky with a darker landscape. It works well with digital because although you can't place the line of density anywhere (it's fixed in the middle but can be rotated), you can later crop in you're editing to get the desired composition. Filter is glass and better than Cokin which is plastic and scratches easily. Cokin filter holder has the advantage of complete adjustability because you slide the filter in and out as well as rotate it. By the way .6 ND is equal to one stop of light, something Tiffen doesn't explain in their marketing materials. They also have half stop, two stop and three stop grad NDs. There are high quality glass filters made for the Cokin system, but they cost 2x or more than the Tiffen.
It does the job October 3, 2008 The Tiffen 58mm uv filter does the job. My main purpose is to protect the lens, which it does fine , with no noticeable optical effect. Any improvement in picture quality is a plus.
rcjp
Got a "Demo" or re-stocked damaged return October 1, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I just decided I'm never purchasing low cost optics by mail again. I purchased a UV Haze and a circular polarizer. The polarizer was perfect, pristine and new. A great buy. The UV Haze had a worn case, when opened was mis-repacked with the instruction manual between the filter and the packing foam protector. The manual was well worn and obviously USED a lot. And of course the UV Haze filter was SCRATCHED. This is a glass filter with no coatings so it takes a real good ding to scratch it with a nice deep 1/4 inch scratch.
I could spend $5-$10 to return it for an exchange, and maybe I will not get a damaged one again, and maybe I will. I question any company that re-stocks an obviously damaged and very worn item. After spending for the extra postage the mail order filter will not be a very good buy.
UV filter - good price and value September 29, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
FOr the most part, this is the least exciting filter you will ever purchase. Yawn! Look at it - it is clear. It does nothing that you can see. That is the point with this. Most of what it provides is protection and safety.
Note that this is NOT one of the thin type filters that allow you to stack several on a lens without getting that nasty vignetting. However, that being said, I did stack this filter and a CPL filter on the 18-55mm kit lnes yesterday with no problem.
VERY DISAPOINTED! September 22, 2008 As some of the reviews I read online had said, the package/kit of 3 filters was an overall disappointment. The polarizer was the worst. I have a six dollar pair of polaroid sunglasses I bought at Wallgreen's that remove more reflection off of objects, deepen the skys blue better than this junk. Of course the filter did not even come any where close to a Nikon filter that I've had and used for 25 years. Also as reported from others here the quality of the metal finnish and threads was bad! I sent it all back within a hour of recieving the delivery of the delivery.
|
|
|
Copyright
©
2006 Adminpal LLC | |