|
| Energizer NH15BP-4 ACCU 2500mAh Rechargeable AA Batteries (Four-pack) | 
 enlarge | Brand: Energizer
Category: CE
List Price: $14.99
Buy New: $6.95
You Save: $8.04 (54%)
New (77) Used (2) from $6.95
Avg. Customer Rating:  111 reviews
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Fragile: No
Batteries Included: No
Battery: nickel-metal-hydride
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 0.6 x 4.3 x 3.7
Legal Disclaimer: Warranty does not cover misuse of product.
MPN: NH15BP4
Model: NH15BP4
UPC: 039800016362
EAN: 0039800016362
ASIN: B00000J47L
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Features:
| • | Four AA NiMH rechargeable batteries | | • | Great for the environment | | • | Ideal for the most advanced, high-drain devices, like digital cameras |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Energizer Rechargeable NiMH round cell batteries' leading-edge technology makes them ideal for the most advanced, high-drain devices--digital cameras, personal digital assistants (PDAs), hand-held games, portable CD players and palmtop computers. Our high-capacity cells provide exceptional power per charge and up to 1,000 recharges. And since they're renewable and reusable, Energizer Rechargeable batteries are a good economic and environmental choice.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 106 more reviews...
 Great item for cameras August 11, 2008
We use these in digital cameras and they work great. best of all we just charge them up when they die and keep on shooting. Also useful for wireless mouse - which otherwise kills batteries.
 horrible self discharge August 11, 2008
i have 8 of these and all of them self discharge to 0.9 v in less than a month.
Additionally, after maybe 10 cycles 4 of them are now flat 3 days xafter charging. 1 does not hold any charge at all
 They can't hold a charge. Try Duracell instead? August 5, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I have about two dozen NiMH rechargeables I use for various electronics devices, including three Nikon flash heads and a GPS. My Energizer 2300mAh and 2500mAh (marked NH-15AA) are much less reliable than my Duracell 2050 mAh. They discharge soon after recharging, and at least 20% are markedly worse than the others; almost one quarter of them are duds and I eventually discard them.
Note that I last bought these a year ago, and they are marked NH-15AA. Maybe Energizer has improved them, or they might simply be rebranded. However, the packaging looks identical.
I'd recommend Duracell instead.
I keep a battery meter next to my MAHA charger, and often find that one of the four batteries I remove from my device is significantly weaker than the other three. When this happens, I write a note on the side of the battery. After three strikes, I throw that battery away. I have discarded and recycled at least five Energizers, and can't recall throwing away a single Duracell.
Terrible self-discharge July 31, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Several years ago when these came out I bought a whole bunch of them because I had previously been using the Rayovac rechargeable NiMh and they just didn't seem to hold a charge for very long. The Energizer ones seemed to be the best thing since sliced bread because they hold 2500 mA, meaning they should last longer, in theory. Well, the great performance in my digital camera only lasted so long. After a few months, I started noticing that my camera would flash the low-battery icon after only taking a handful of photos but couldn't figure out what the deal was. I tried buying new ones which started doing the same thing. As it turns out, it was that dirty term called "self-discharge rate" that was the culprit. Most tests now show that the Energizer rechargeable NiMh batteries have an absurdly high self-discharge rate. If you charge the batteries and keep them on hand for a month or so until you need them, there will be hardly any charge left in them! If I charge the batteries and pop them into the camera right from the charger, they last a long time. Otherwise, it stinks.
I much prefer the new Sanyo Eneloop batteries. They were engineered specifically to reduce the self-discharge rate. They are MUCH better. And it appears they cost less than the Energizer batteries. Don't worry about the mA rating being lower. The charge that your Energizer will have after sitting around for a few weeks will be lower than the 2000 mA in the Eneloop after the same amount of standby time.
Long lasting June 28, 2008
I had an older version of these batteries and they lasted 5 years. Saved a lot of money. They worked great with our digital camera.
|
|
|
Copyright
©
2006 Adminpal LLC | |
