|
| Oregon Scientific DS6310-B 3MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Blue) | 
 enlarge | Brand: Oregon Scientific
Category: Photography
List Price: $119.95
Buy New: $59.95
You Save: $60.00 (50%)
New (5) from $59.95
Avg. Customer Rating:  16 reviews
Sales Rank: 39006
Color: Oregon Scientific DS6310-B 3MP Digital Camera (Blue)
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Batteries Included: No
Floppy Disk Drive: None
Optical Zoom: 1
Display Size: 1.5
Minimum Focal Length: 8.2
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 9 x 8.3 x 2.8
MPN: DS6310-B
Model: DS6310-B
UPC: 734811316080
EAN: 0734811316080
ASIN: B000BK7R78
Release Date: November 15, 2005
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Customer Reviews:
| Showing reviews 1-5 of 16 | | NEXT » |
 Don't buy CMOS cameras May 6, 2008
Most good digital cameras use CCD lens technology. CMOS is old, normally used for security cameras. Even though I don't own this camera (and I generally hate reading reviews by people who don't own the product), I have owned a Polaroid camera of similar specs & price - with a CMOS lens. It mysteriously died in less than a year (company would service, but it would cost almost as much as purchase price for part) and picture quality was horrible. I regret not having done my research, b/c I took pics of my first baby with it and now with my second baby on a Canon, I can totally see the difference in quality.
General tip I've learned: if the company doesn't have a history of making cameras (35mm cameras), then don't trust it! (Kodak and Fuji are probably OK, but not the best.) I remember Oregon Scientific from the calculators I used while I was flunking calculus...!
 Small lightweight camera June 1, 2007
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
This camera takes good pictures for being so compact. A little difficult at the begining to take a picture, but after I followed the instructions it was a snap.
NOT WORTH IT January 16, 2007
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
PICTURE QUALITY FOR A 3 MEGAPIXEL CAMERA IS VERY DISAPPOINTING! THE ONLY GOOD THING IS ITS SMALL SIZE. WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS CAMERA FOR ANYTHING BUT A CHILDS TOY AND AT THE SELLING PRICE IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE FOR THAT.
Don't bother November 24, 2006
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Extremely low quality pics. Short battery life. Not worth spending any money on.
I got this camera for free thank goodness. Now I am just trying to find a way to get rid of it.
Pretty Good September 1, 2006
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
I got this camera back in 2003 and I loved it..i would take it everywhere...but then no too long ago it just stopd working and i really dont know what was wrong w it..but hey for a first time slim camera is not bad @ all..
|
|
|
Copyright
©
2006 Adminpal LLC | |
