|
| Canon 72mm UV Haze Filter | 
 enlarge | Brand: Canon
Category: Photography
List Price: $40.00
Buy New: $19.95
You Save: $20.05 (50%)
New (10) from $19.95
Avg. Customer Rating:  25 reviews
Media: Electronics
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 4.1 x 3.7 x 0.6
MPN: 8-7201
Model: 8-7201
UPC: 082966805875
EAN: 0082966805875
ASIN: B00021OCRE
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Customer Reviews:
| Showing reviews 1-5 of 25 | | NEXT » |
 good July 19, 2008
I am a beginner in photography and I am aware of the debate about using a filter and not using a filter. I chose to use one to protect my lens although it seems a little expensive for what it is. This filter is easy to install on the lens and remove for cleaning. It is working as I expected it to.
Canon 72mmUV Haze Filter July 15, 2008
This filter is a must to have in your accessory bag! It works wonders with the color images and making them as vibrant as they are intended to be!
 Canon 72mm UV Haze filter review July 10, 2008
Nicely made filter. No problems with glass to metal mating, or threads. We're using it on a Sigma 18mm-200mm optically stablized lens. I'd recommend it to anyone needing such a filter.
Great buy, sturdy and durable lens cover July 4, 2008
I have had this lens cover for almost a year now, and it has not failed me since. The frame of the lens is made of rigid metal, and the lens is made out of some firm glass. The lens cover screws onto my Canon lens with no problem, and I would expect the same for any other type of lens other than Canon. Overall excellent quality and great durablity.
 ok for the price June 30, 2008
i've bought this one for my canon 200mm f/2.8L II ...
althought sharpness has not suffered.. flare has ... which buggs me alot..
i also would like to point out that when i took the filter out of its package.. it had smears and oily smudges on it... and that really pissed me off.. if some one is to smear my filter .. it should be MEEE
kinda disappointed with it..
when it comes to optics.. you get what you pay for is a safe assumption..
|
|
|
Copyright
©
2006 Adminpal LLC | |
