echo "test"; ?> |
|
|
|
| Nikon Super CoolScan 9000 ED Film Scanner | 
enlarge | Brand: Nikon Category: CE
Buy New: Too low to display
New (2)
Avg. Customer Rating: 11 reviews
Media: Electronics Autographed: No Memorabilia: No Shipping Weight (lbs): 30.8 Dimensions (in): 10 x 8 x 20
MPN: 9237 Model: 9237 UPC: 018208092376 EAN: 0018208092376 ASIN: B0001DYUDE
Release Date: February 15, 2004 Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping Availability: Usually ships in 1 to 2 months
|
| Customer Reviews:
| Showing reviews 1-5 of 11 | | NEXT » |
For medium format negatives, easily better than my local pro lab December 20, 2006 15 out of 15 found this review helpful
I was astonished at what this scanner could do, in terms of preserving the gentle tones of my black and white negatives. My only regret is that there is no equivalent to Digital ICE for black and white. That problem is not unique to this scanner, of course.
The quality of the images I get from this scanner, with negatives from a basic 1970-vintage twin lens camera, trounces the images I get with a Canon 5D SLR. I also have used it with 35MM negatives, which work beautifully, and with both 4.5cm x 4.5cm negatives and 110 negatives, which require that I jury-rig a special mask for the glass-covered medium format carriage (FH-869GR, not included).
The 9000ED comes with a 35MM carriage, 35MM slide carriage, and basic MF carriage. For the price, I would have preferred if they had included the glass-covered, rotating 120 unit as well.
Best solution for what I needed November 10, 2006 6 out of 8 found this review helpful
The device has worked exactly as I had hoped allowing me to archieve hundreds of old negatives that would have been lost or cost much more than what I paid for it. I am very pleased.
Amazing scans of seriously degraded film May 30, 2006 17 out of 17 found this review helpful
I bought one of these units primarily to digitally archive hundreds of old photos shot and mounted as 6x6 and 35mm slides, as well as lots of B&W 35mm negatives. The 6x6 color slides are as much as 50 years old, with some mounted in glass -- which was a bad idea, as those slides have had exceptionally severe color shifts and many have been partially eaten by fungus trapped behind the glass. The scanner's digital ICE and ROC were downright magical (GEM less so, and DEE was sometimes great but touchy to adjust for some slides). With just a few exceptions, even gross over and under exposed slides still yielded usable images. Infected slides that I could barely see through came out perfect except for little pink splotches where the fungus was particularly nasty. The only other defect observed was that interference rings were highly visible on 3 out of about 50 glass-mounted slides... which I suspect was due to the slides having been overheated years ago when they were viewed by projection. Some non-glass mounted slides had significant heat warp damage, but I didn't see serious problems in their scans. BTW, scanning 6x6 slides requires an optional adapter... it's a pitty that the adapter doesn't hold at least three 6x6 slides at once and it does take a little time to put a new slide in, but that time was hidden by the processing time using my 1.6GHz Turion laptop. The 35mm slides are better exposed, newer, and in better condition; the worst of them was handled very well by this scanner. I haven't yet tried scanning the B&W negatives.
Fantastic April 18, 2006 17 out of 17 found this review helpful
The quality of this scanner is amazing. The detail that it picks up from slides and negatives is incredible. The only drawbacks are that you have to scan bw negatives without Digital Ice (so you'll have a lot of manual cleanup to do) and the fact that there are no trays to scan 110 and 126 negative film (you could conceivably rig the existing trays to accomplish this). Still, it definitely gives you professional results. Sometimes the tray does go off track, but it's sporadic and so far nothing that can't be fixed with a reboot. A true value for your money - paying to have your negs and slides scanned would cost much more than buying this unit.
Distorted Ratings October 28, 2005 8 out of 12 found this review helpful
The low ratings for this scanner are due to availability problems. The scanner itself is excellent!
|
|
|
Copyright
©
2006 Adminpal LLC | |