Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com

Adminpal

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras

Adminpal
Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » GPS » Zoom » Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR CamerasNovember 18, 2008  
Departments
Computers
Software
Electronics
Cell Phones
Cameras
Music
Games
GPS
TVs and HDTVs
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
Brand: Canon
Category: Photography

List Price: $970.00
Buy New: $586.00
You Save: $384.00 (40%)



New (29) Used (4)

Avg. Customer Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars 163 reviews

Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Optical Zoom: 2.9
Maximum Focal Length: 200
Minimum Focal Length: 70
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9
Dimensions (in): 9.9 x 5.4 x 5.4
Warranty: 1 year warranty

MPN: 2578A003
Model: 2578A003
UPC: 082966214202
EAN: 4581156960999
ASIN: B000053HH5

Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 16-20 of 163
 « PREV  
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
... 33   NEXT »

5 out of 5 stars Far Superior to the Canon EF70-300 Image Stabilized Lens For the Same Price!!   July 17, 2008
 4 out of 4 found this review helpful

I mostly shoot outdoor sports, predominantly baseball, and had my socks knocked off the first time out with the lens at a nightgame, at which there would eventually be a heavy downpour. The lens performed like a champ, even during the downpour! Unlike the EF70-300IS, the lens locked right away on the focus area, and in auto focus mode (AF), did not "hunt" for the subject to be focused on. A great buy and a lens I'd highly recommend,


5 out of 5 stars Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L   July 6, 2008
 3 out of 3 found this review helpful

Absolutely the best lens I have ever used bar none! Fast, quiet auto focus & great images. If you are looking for a great lens at a moderate price, this is it. Some of the reviews talk about the low light factor being a drawback because of the F/4 which is true but can somewhat be overcome by shooting a higher ISO. I highly recommend this lens. If you have twice the money the IS version might give you a better percentage of low light images that are keepers but for the money this is a fantastic lens. Use the following link to read a review of this lens.

[...]



5 out of 5 stars Another more than satisfactory purchase   June 28, 2008
 2 out of 2 found this review helpful

Just beginning to take up photography and from the very start I am extremely thrilled with the results of this purchase and what i have learned from using it. The one regret I have is that I didn't spend the extra money and purchased the the f/2.8 but we live and learn, More than satisfeid with the delivery, the condition and the results of using this product


5 out of 5 stars Absolutely gorgeous   June 14, 2008
 2 out of 2 found this review helpful

The optics on this lens are out of this world. The daytime photos I've taken with it have been excellent. The colors, sharpness, and contrast with this lens make it worth every penny. When shooting with it, I rarely have to do any post processing because the photos come out gorgeous almost every time.


5 out of 5 stars Buy This Lens!!!   June 9, 2008
 18 out of 18 found this review helpful

If you're considering this lens, it means you are hoping the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras version of this lens and the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras version of this lens are unnecessary. Let me tell you, I was in the same position: I really wanted the f/2.8L IS version, but didn't know if spending the extra $1K was worth it or not. I got this lens (f/4L, non-IS) and am COMPLETELY happy with my decision! This lens is about as light as an L lens gets, and f/4 is completely acceptable for this level of zoom, I've found. I'm really glad I saved my money (and put it towards the amazing Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Ultra Wide Angle Zoom Lens).

This lens isn't as white as I thought it would be. It seems to be more of an off-white, but that doesn't bother me. This is my first L Series lens, and I'm completely hooked! Everything about it is well-made! Even the surface of the lens is easy to grip and adjust, and it comes with a lens hood, as does the 16-35mm f/2.8L, so you don't have to worry about purchasing one separately. I got a good CP filter and an ExpoDisc for the lens, and that's really all you'll need for a modern camera. I've learned that modern digital cameras don't even really see the UV wavelengths that the UV filters used to protect your shots from, so unless you want to spend money on a little bit of lens protection by buying a UV filter, don't bother.

In summary: If you're considering this lens, get it! Don't waste your money on the f/2.8L or IS versions unless you really need it and can afford it, in which case, you probably wouldn't be considering this lens! Keep in mind a couple things: The other versions of this lens will be heavier and larger, so will be more difficult to carry. Also, a 70-200mm on a 40D or Rebel will actually be 112-320mm, as most Canon digital cameras will have a 1.6 "crop factor" compared to the more expensive 5D or hyper-expensive 1Ds Mark III, which are full-frame cameras.

I am completely satisfied with this purchase and would make the same decision again! If you get this lens, you won't be unhappy!


Copyright © 2006 Adminpal LLC