|
| Monster Cable MB AA 1850-4 Ultra-High Capacity Rechargeable Monster PowerCells | 
 enlarge | Brand: Monster
Category: CE
This item is no longer available
Avg. Customer Rating:  12 reviews
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Fragile: No
Number Of Items: 1
Batteries Included: No
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 4.5 x 2.9 x 1
Warranty: 1 year warranty
MPN: MB AA 1800-4
Model: 103569
UPC: 490080003389
EAN: 0050644282683
ASIN: B00005T3EJ
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Best yet October 23, 2003
3 out of 4 found this review helpful
I have tried the Energizer Accu-Rechargeable which are rated at 1200 mAh. The Monster Cable batteries blow them away. They last MUCH longer and the Energizers have started to leak after only a few charges!
Technology is getting better, will try the Kodak batteries next. They are cheaper and have a better mHa rating. Even so, I would recommend these.
5 Oct 2004
after using the Kodak batteries (offered through Amazon) I would recommend them too. I haven't tested them head-to-head but both sets work well with my digital camera and Leapster.
28 October 2006
Still standing by my first review. After owning the Monster, Kodak and 2 sets of Powerex (2300mAh) - I'm a NiMH convert. They all perform very well in toys and my digital camera, the Energizer batteries are the only ones that have been duds.
High capacity for digital photography May 9, 2003
8 out of 9 found this review helpful
Digital cameras eat batteries, period. With 4 of these in my Fuji, I took over 200 flash pictures at a party without a problem. I never had to get out my set of spares. That's the way it is; that's the way it should be. Highly recommended.
Economical April 5, 2003
7 out of 7 found this review helpful
I own 14 of these batteries now, and I use them for every battery operated device I own. They are much more powerful than other batteries and charge fully in about 3 hours. The battery charger is also conveniently small. Highly recommended for high drain devices (I own 2 MP3-CD Players and a digital camera.)
Worth the Money September 30, 2002
11 out of 16 found this review helpful
Worth the money so far. But only if you use it in something like a digital camera that can suck down power. I have gotten over 100 pics with flash on my Olympus, where I got less than 40 with regular NIMH, and 20 with alkaline. On a recent trip, I brought 2 charged sets and got all of my pictures taken without needing to resort to recharging.
 Good Batteries July 9, 2002
100 out of 105 found this review helpful
Well, like most Monster products, this is a high quality product that is overpriced. I really wish the other people writing reviews didn't feel the need to write in caps with exclamation points all over the place. These are not the highest powered batteries, the newer Kodak Max 1850 mAh ones are. They are also cheaper. These Monster batteries are good, just not the best, or best value. For those interested in battery/charger combos:
The Kodak Max 1850 mAh do not currently come bundled with their K2000 charger(they bundle the 1700s).
Monster does bundle their 1800 mAh batteries with their charger.
Kodak's charger can charge all 4 batteries at the same time, while Monster's can only charge 2 at a time. Monster's combo
also costs more than Kodak. Just some pros and cons to think about. I personally feel Kodak is a better value.
|
|
|
Copyright
©
2006 Adminpal LLC | |
