|
| Canon CanoScan 4400F Color Image Scanner (1306B002) | 
 enlarge | Brand: Canon
Category: CE
List Price: $99.99
Buy New: $83.92
You Save: $16.07 (16%)
New (50) Used (2) from $81.11
Avg. Customer Rating:  243 reviews
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Shipping Weight (lbs): 11.7
Dimensions (in): 10.2 x 18.7 x 3.3
Legal Disclaimer: Warranty does not cover misuse of product.
Warranty: 1 year warranty
MPN: 1306B002
Model: 1306B002
UPC: 013803067880
EAN: 0013803067880
ASIN: B000HDWZLC
Release Date: August 7, 2006
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Low Cost, Lots of Features, Bundled Software Good, Quiet, Fast February 9, 2007
22 out of 22 found this review helpful
I love the one touch buttons on the front that loads software and scans all in the touch of a button. Excellent photo quality scans. The software for scanning color photos has a fading correction feature that works great. I never realized how much my old color photos had faded until I used this feature to correct for that. Excellent and easy to use other photo correction capabilities as well as many other scanning options. The lid for the bed has the ability to flex at the hinge pivot point to allow for placing of large books or photo albums. Easy to install software and hardware. Just plug the power cord and USB cord in, run the install and it's ready. Driver support for other software programs works well too.
All around, excellent price and quality!!
The only possible down side is the bed size is basically letter size, so scanning legal size documents is out. That's okay for me, just make sure it's okay for you. Canon has similar larger scanners that I would trust after using this one.
By the way, I had to call their support number because I thought an item was missing in the shipment (it wasnt, just my mistake in un-boxing the scanner) but they were ready to send me a replacement part right away. Excellent support!!
 Great Scanner February 8, 2007
4 out of 5 found this review helpful
This scanner for the price is great. It does exactly what I need for my type of work.
This is the second Cannon product I have owned. Was not happy with my HP maybe it's time to change?
A really good inexpensive scanner and really good for film negatives February 6, 2007
8 out of 8 found this review helpful
I haven't used the various features a bunch but I bought this scanner to be good at regular scans and also be able to scan film negatives. I had two different Microtek scanners before and each came with a film negative scanner attachment. This scanner is much easier to use and the results are 10 times better. Instead of having a separate attachment, the film negative holder is built into the lid which has a cover when not scanning negatives. When you choose negatives, the backlit activates and, when it scans the strip of negatives, you can then choose which negatives you wish to convert to pictures. The colors didn't require much fixing in PhotoShop (like my previous experiences)- just be careful of dust and scratches on the negatives. It might not be the best scanner overall at any price but it is definitely a great scanner for the money.
typical Canon Quality February 5, 2007
6 out of 6 found this review helpful
This is my fifth Canon Scanner. I have come to rely on the color I get from Canon Products. The images need only minimum tweaking in PhotoShop, if at all.
The installation was true plug and play as usual.
Unless things rapidly decline, Canon will always be my scanner of choice.
 Slow and hard to install February 2, 2007
7 out of 10 found this review helpful
I bought the 4400F scanner as an addition to my network accessories. My idea was to attach it to a central server, share the server drive where the scans would be saved, and then also use the scanner as a copier by pointing the "copy" function to a network printer.
I ran into two problems very quickly that convinced me to send it back. First, the software drivers are not particularly easy to install and they conflicted with the printer drivers for the network printer (made by a different manufacturer). Once I got the scanner working, however, I was almost willing to forgive the incompatibility and figure out a different network configuration.
Then I scanned some photographs to test the quality of the scans. The quality of the scans were pretty good at 300 dpi, but it took forever! Given both downsides to this machine, I saw little reason to keep it.
If your setup involves the scanner being attached to the computer you normally use, and you don't need to worry about long wait times on high-resolution scans, then this might be the scanner for you. But if you have a more complicated configuration, don't bother.
|
|
|
Copyright
©
2006 Adminpal LLC | |
